| To: | Peter Grandi <pg_xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: stable xfs |
| From: | Ming Zhang <mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:36:06 -0400 |
| Cc: | Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <17595.47312.720883.451573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1153150223.4532.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17595.47312.720883.451573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Thanks for your response. But could you give me an example on what is an improper use? Ming On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 17:20 +0100, Peter Grandi wrote: > >>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:30:23 -0400, Ming Zhang > >>> <mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > mingz> Hi All We want to use XFS in all of our production > mingz> servers but feel a little scary about the corruption > mingz> problems seen in this list. [ ... ] > > XFS is complex but quite stable code. Most of the reports about > ''corruption'' are consequences of not being aware of what it > was designed for, how it works and how it should be used... > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: oops with CentOS 4.3 / xfs / nfsd, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: stable xfs, Peter Grandi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: stable xfs, Peter Grandi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |