xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove unused locking flags

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove unused locking flags
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:57:23 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060712153719.GA620@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20060708215324.GA7522@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060709105454.D1640104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060709125643.GA28769@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060710081711.A1670244@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060710165100.GA11567@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060711120059.D1702118@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060712153719.GA620@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:37:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >  - adding a new inherit_nodfrg flag that's not actually used anywhere
> > 
> > C'mon, you know better.  Try inode allocation, in xfs_inode.c.
> 
> Look again.  It's not used anywhere in fs/xfs/ in Linus' tree.

Actual the define with the xfs_ prefix and vowels in the identifier is
used, sorry.  The grepping kernel developer would be a lot happier if
both identifiers were spelled either with or without the vowel, though :)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>