| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: add xfs_btree_check_lptr_disk |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:44:14 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060712112400.A1734462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20060710170420.GD26786@xxxxxx> <20060712104921.A1732817@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060712112400.A1734462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
> > INT_GET? Maybe static inline here for type checking? *shrug*. > > Just this question remains - any preference on inline or not here? I'll try to make it an inline when respinning the patch. It's been a long time since I did the initial version of this patch and I can't remember if I had any reason to go for the macro. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: add xfs_btree_check_lptr_disk, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Delivered state of DMAPI Event, Michael Li (gmail) |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: add xfs_btree_check_lptr_disk, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: add xfs_btree_check_lptr_disk, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |