| To: | Brian Davis <bridavis@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Output of mkfs.xfs su/sw values don't match the command line su/sw values |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Jul 2006 12:13:21 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <44AFF7AA.2040001@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from bridavis@xxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 02:21:30PM -0400 |
| References: | <44AFF7AA.2040001@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 02:21:30PM -0400, Brian Davis wrote: > ... > localhost ~ # mkfs.xfs -f -d sunit=128,swidth=256 /dev/sda1 > meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=256 agcount=32, agsize=4578992 > blks > = sectsz=512 attr=0 > data = bsize=4096 blocks=146527744, imaxpct=25 > = sunit=16 swidth=32 blks, unwritten=1 > naming =version 2 bsize=4096 > log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=1 > = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks > realtime =none extsz=65536 blocks=0, rtextents=0 > > Why does the output display the sunit=16 and swidth=32 when I wanted it > configured with 128 and 256 respectively? It looks like the output is > displaying the fs block size (4096) rather than 512 blocks specified on > the command line and the man page. > Is this correct? Thats correct. Odd, isn't it? Dunno why it was done this way (waay before my time) ... its been like that forever though. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsprogs 2.8.4 installs Polish locale message files?, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove unused locking flags, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Output of mkfs.xfs su/sw values don't match the command line su/sw values, Brian Davis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Output of mkfs.xfs su/sw values don't match the command line su/sw values, Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |