| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Snapshot in XFS |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:14:36 -0500 |
| Cc: | ORI IDAN <ori@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060628065523.GA1045@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20060627135402.C91D22580B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060628065523.GA1045@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060516) |
Chris Wedgwood wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:53:42PM +0200, ORI IDAN wrote:3. If not, is it possible to reduce the freeze time, and what is the minimum time?if you fsync before the freeze does that help? Presumably then you'd wait about as long for the sync to return :) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [LOCKDEP] xfs: possible recursive locking detected, Matthew Wilcox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Snapshot in XFS, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | PARTIAL TAKE 954365 - fix some Makefile dependency problems, Tim Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Snapshot in XFS, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |