| To: | Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:10:50 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607252215010.12906@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>; from jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de on Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:16:10PM +0200 |
| References: | <20060718222941.GA3801@stargate.galaxy> <20060719085731.C1935136@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607221722500.8407@prinz64.housecafe.de> <20060724090138.C2083275@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607252215010.12906@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Now that 2.6.17.7 is finally there, I am going to eyeball my XFS > filesystems. Does xfsprogs 2.7.11 suffice? Sure, except for the repair issue which Barry is working on (see the FAQ). > Please update the XFS FAQ about this problem (and the solution, for > others that did not read LKML), thanks! That was done last week. You shoulda read it before sending this, and saved me some time replying. ;) cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only?, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | review: block bogus bulkstat messages, last stage, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1, Jan Engelhardt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1, Christian Kujau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |