| To: | Ming Zhang <mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: stable xfs |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:26:32 -0700 |
| Cc: | Peter Grandi <pg_xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1153441178.2768.158.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <17597.27469.834961.186850@base.ty.sabi.co.UK> <1153272044.2669.282.camel@localhost.localdomain> <17598.2129.999932.67127@base.ty.sabi.co.UK> <1153314670.2691.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060720061527.GB18135@tuatara.stupidest.org> <1153404502.2768.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060720161707.GB26748@tuatara.stupidest.org> <1153413481.2768.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060720190401.GA28836@tuatara.stupidest.org> <1153441178.2768.158.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:19:38PM -0400, Ming Zhang wrote: > what will be the side effect about this scattering? there is a desire in some cases to have files in the same directory close to each other on disk > one thing i worry about fsr is when do fsr and some power loss > events happen, can xfs handle this well? yes, fsr create a temporary file, unlinks it, copies the extents over, and does an atomic swap-extents-if-nothing-changed operation |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: stable xfs, Ming Zhang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Patches and reviews, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: stable xfs, Ming Zhang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: stable xfs, Ming Zhang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |