xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...)

To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...)
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:12:46 -0700
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Torsten Landschoff <torsten@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, ml@xxxxxxxx, radsaq@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201910010.20652@p34.internal.lan>
References: <44BF8500.1010708@dgreaves.com> <20060720161121.GA26748@tuatara.stupidest.org> <20060721081452.B1990742@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201817450.23697@p34.internal.lan> <20060721082448.C1990742@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201843020.2619@p34.internal.lan> <20060721085230.F1990742@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201855270.2652@p34.internal.lan> <20060721090015.G1990742@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201910010.20652@p34.internal.lan>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 07:10:46PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:

> I can run this over and over, and the result is the same?

lost+found is recreated every time, rename it and you'll get less
output


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>