[Top] [All Lists]

Re: stable xfs

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: stable xfs
From: Martin Steigerwald <ms@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:40:05 +0200
Cc: Ming Zhang <mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060719095400.A1936041@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Organization: team(ix) GmbH
References: <1153150223.4532.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060719095400.A1936041@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
Am Mittwoch, 19. Juli 2006 01:54 schrieb Nathan Scott:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Ming Zhang wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > We want to use XFS in all of our production servers but feel a little
> > scary about the corruption problems seen in this list. I wonder which
> > 2.6.16+ kernel we can use in order to get a stable XFS? Thanks!
> Use the latest 2.6.17 -stable release, or a vendor kernel (SLES is
> particularly good with XFS, as SGI works closely with SUSE).

Hello Nathan,

as far as I can see the fix for kernel bug #6757 has not yet made it in a 
stable kernel release upto and thus should manually be applied:


It probably doesn't happen for lots of people but I would still apply that 
patch unless it is finally put into a stable point release.

Martin Steigerwald - team(ix) GmbH - http://www.teamix.de
gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>