xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: add xfs_btree_check_lptr_disk

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: add xfs_btree_check_lptr_disk
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:24:00 +1000
In-reply-to: <20060712104921.A1732817@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>; from nathans@sgi.com on Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:49:21AM +1000
References: <20060710170420.GD26786@lst.de> <20060712104921.A1732817@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:49:21AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > --- xfs-2.6.x.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.h       2006-07-09 19:34:52.000000000 
> > +0200
> > +++ xfs-2.6.x/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.h    2006-07-09 19:37:01.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -243,6 +243,9 @@
> >     xfs_dfsbno_t            ptr,    /* btree block disk address */
> >     int                     level); /* btree block level */
> >  
> > +#define xfs_btree_check_lptr_disk(cur, ptr, level) \
> > +   xfs_btree_check_lptr(cur, INT_GET(ptr, ARCH_CONVERT), level)
> > +
> 
> Shouldn't this be using be64_to_cpu() instead of the old school

Ah, you do that in a later patch in the series.

> INT_GET?  Maybe static inline here for type checking?  *shrug*.

Just this question remains - any preference on inline or not here?

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>