xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: thank you, xfs team

To: Hungerburg <lklm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: thank you, xfs team
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 08:50:44 +1000
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060703221117.GA27898@lazy.shacknet.nu>; from lklm@lazy.shacknet.nu on Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:11:17AM +0200
References: <20060703221117.GA27898@lazy.shacknet.nu>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:11:17AM +0200, Hungerburg wrote:
> hello there,
> 
> I hope this is not the wrong place, yet I have to write this now, before
> I forget about it:

xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is the best place.

> I had to swap a dying harddrive. after receiving many mails from the
> smart daemon, recent kernel patches to xfs made me aware of the full
> extent of the problem.

Hmm, the second part of that sentence doesn't make sense to me.

> keywords:
> - XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN
> - Device: /dev/hda, 1 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
> - Device: /dev/hda, 1 Offline uncorrectable sectors

This looks like expected behaviour - XFS shut down the filesystem on
detecting IO errors on filesystem metadata blocks.

> the tools to copy what is still there (data) are a boon - they require
> some reading, but the thing is doable (xfs_copy to good disk, then
> xfs_dump from there)

OK, good to hear.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: thank you, xfs team, Nathan Scott <=