| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Repeating fs corruption |
| From: | ViNiL <vladimir.linek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:07:45 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <200606211224.09570.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200606201758.20400.vladimir.linek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200606211151.54376.vladimir.linek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200606211224.09570.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.3 |
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 12:24, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > I suggest you try 2.6.17 with has barrier functionality on by default as > soon as you convinced its stable enough for your usage. Until then it > might be a good idea to try without write caching and see if that helps. > Or revert back to 2.6.15 and see if that helps, but thats probably not > worth the trouble. > > I am no expert on this and YMMV. Maybe an XFS developer can give you > feedback that is more accurate than mine. Thank you for quick reply. We'll give 2.6.17 a chance... -- ViNiL Ever since they switched all the crts to lcds at work, I'm not getting any tan.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Repeating fs corruption, Martin Steigerwald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [XFSDUMP PATCH] Fixes for parallel compiles, Bill Kendall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Repeating fs corruption, Martin Steigerwald |
| Next by Thread: | Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000, Denis Nikiforov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |