[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question about sparse files

To: John Groves <John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question about sparse files
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:23:06 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4490B09F.20903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 07:58:07PM -0500
References: <44905B9F.5000401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060615081403.B918399@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4490B09F.20903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 07:58:07PM -0500, John Groves wrote:
> Thanks Nathan and Eric.  Roger to Eric's point re: holes smaller than 
> the filesystem blocksize (I suppose I could lseek past a small chunk 
> while writing, it just wouldn't be a hole, right?)
> I presume that my hole must not just be a multiple of the filesystem 
> blocksize -- it should also be blocksize-aligned.  A single-block chunk 
> that I lseek past while writing would be two sub-blocksize null sections 
> (but not a hole) unless it's blocksize-aligned.  Right?



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>