| To: | Evan Fraser <evan@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM? |
| From: | Jon Lewis <jlewis@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:20:12 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | James Pearson <james-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <44904063.7010606@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <448A98E8.9040109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <448F8C8A.4070008@xxxxxxx> <44902413.20305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0606141118150.2562@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44904063.7010606@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Evan Fraser wrote: Hmm, well we've been using XFS on software raid's with a 2.4.29 kernel on roughly 10 NFS servers for over a year now without problems. Though we are rolling them up to FC4 as they become available. Using who's kernel source/package and XFS version? Last I looked, the SGI XFS CVS tree [for 2.4.x] was based on 2.4.31. With it, you can export an XFS fs over NFS, but the clients that mount it cannot actually open any files. Trying results in i/o errors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Jon Lewis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Evan Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Evan Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |