| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM? |
| From: | James Pearson <james-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:58:27 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <448F8C8A.4070008@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <448A98E8.9040109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <448F8C8A.4070008@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040524 |
Eric Sandeen wrote: Do you know at which point these remaining issues got resolved? - for example, could there be any potential stack problems using RHEL4 (U3) with the XFS module from <ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/RHEL4/> ?There were more stack reductions after that. Which is -not- to say that you -will- have problems with the above... all depends on what you're doing. But Nathan did more stack work after I put that rpm out. In my case, I would want to do NFS serving with XFS file systems - some of the servers may use software raid as well. James Pearson |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: error 990, Norman Krebs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Jon Lewis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Jon Lewis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |