| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM? |
| From: | James Pearson <james-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:03:20 +0100 |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) |
Nathan Scott wrote: On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:41:02PM +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:I was wondering if the above config will work or if it's still considered "if it breaks you get to keep the broken stack" ? ...We are unaware of any remaining XFS issues with 4K stacks... so, let us know if anything does go BOOM. Do you know at which point these remaining issues got resolved? - for example, could there be any potential stack problems using RHEL4 (U3) with the XFS module from <ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/RHEL4/> ? Thanks James Pearson |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Stefan Smietanowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, KELEMEN Peter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, KELEMEN Peter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |