| To: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM? |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:01:05 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4489968E.7070102@xxxxxxxxxx>; from stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:41:02PM +0200 |
| References: | <4489968E.7070102@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:41:02PM +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: > I was wondering if the above config will work or if it's still > considered "if it breaks you get to keep the broken stack" ? > ... We are unaware of any remaining XFS issues with 4K stacks... so, let us know if anything does go BOOM. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Files not starting on swidth, Dave Lloyd |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |