| To: | James Pearson <james-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM? |
| From: | Jon Lewis <jlewis@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:19:35 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <44902413.20305@moving-picture.com> |
| References: | <448A98E8.9040109@moving-picture.com> <448F8C8A.4070008@sgi.com> <44902413.20305@moving-picture.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, James Pearson wrote: There were more stack reductions after that. Which is -not- to say that you -will- have problems with the above... all depends on what you're doing. But Nathan did more stack work after I put that rpm out. AFAIK, the 2.4 kernel series XFS CVS still doesn't do NFS service of XFS filesystems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, James Pearson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Jon Lewis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, James Pearson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Evan Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |