| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM? |
| From: | KELEMEN Peter <Peter.Kelemen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:48:46 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <448A98E8.9040109@moving-picture.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | CERN European Laboratory for Particle Physics, Switzerland |
| References: | <448A98E8.9040109@moving-picture.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
* James Pearson (james-P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) [20060610 11:03]: > Do you know at which point these remaining issues got resolved? - for > example, could there be any potential stack problems using RHEL4 (U3) > with the XFS module from <ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/RHEL4/> ? There are, but you need many parallel I/O streams to trigger it. Peter -- .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'' Kelemen PÃter / \ / \ Peter.Kelemen@xxxxxxx .+' `+...+' `+...+' `+...+' `+...+' |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, James Pearson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Updated sysctl documentation take #2, Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, James Pearson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |