| To: | Markus Schoder <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and noatime |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 May 2006 08:25:58 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200605272339.12352.lists@gammarayburst.de>; from lists@gammarayburst.de on Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:39:12PM +0200 |
| References: | <200605272339.12352.lists@gammarayburst.de> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:39:12PM +0200, Markus Schoder wrote: > Seems that XFS updates the atime for binary files that are executed even > if noatime is specified on mount. > Is this the intended behaviour? ext3 for example behaves differently. It wasn't intended, no; it regressed one/two 2.6.x point releases ago. It has been fixed in CVS, and is queued up for the next merge which will be post 2.6.17. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS and noatime, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and noatime, Christian Kujau |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS and noatime, Christian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |