xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Error 990

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Error 990
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 19:20:05 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Gorazd Golob <gorazd.golob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060412084647.D1288190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1144744915.10995.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060411091157.GB4359@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1144748564.10995.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604110730530.7449@p34> <20060412084647.D1288190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Theres so many errors in that statement I don't even know where
to start correcting it!
Must have been thinking of something else...

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Nathan Scott wrote:

On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 07:31:12AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
There is an option when you make the filesystem so it does not fill it
with NULL's when it fsck's the filesystem I believe...

Theres so many errors in that statement I don't even know where
to start correcting it!

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 02:11 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:41:55AM +0200, Gorazd Golob wrote:

What can be wrong - filesystem is XFS on 2.6.15.6 - x86_64.

990 is EFSCORRUPTED (nothing outside of XFS uses that error code hence
the abiguity at times)

try xfs_repair

xfs_repair filled some of files with NULLs. Very uncool ;)

Thats not correct either.

Pretty sure theres a FAQ entry on the notorious "NULL files" issue.
It has nothing to do with xfs_repair or unwritten extents FWIW.

cheers.

--
Nathan




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>