| To: | Christian Røsnes <christian.rosnes@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#5 / xfsdatad |
| From: | Iustin Pop <iusty@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:55:52 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <443A61DF.7080801@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christian Røsnes <christian.rosnes@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <443916EC.10809@xxxxxxxxx> <20060410014701.GJ2732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <443A61DF.7080801@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 |
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 03:47:11PM +0200, Christian Røsnes wrote: > Thank you for the information. > > Is there a preferred way of distributing interrupts across several Xeon > cpus ? I'm not sure, but how about irq-balance? ~$ apt-cache search irq balance irqbalance - Balances irq's for SMP systems Description: Balances irq's for SMP systems Daemon to balance irq's across multiple CPUs on systems with the 2.4 or 2.6 kernel. This can lead to better performance and IO balance on SMP systems. Useful mostly just for 2.4 kernels, or 2.6 kernels with CONFIG_IRQBALANCE turned off. So either you install this or configure the kernel with CONFIG_IRQBALANCE (though I have never seen this option). Regards, Iustin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#5 / xfsdatad, Christian Røsnes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#5 / xfsdatad, Christian Røsnes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#5 / xfsdatad, Christian Røsnes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#5 / xfsdatad, Christian Røsnes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |