| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc |
| From: | nathans@xxxxxxx (Nathan Scott) |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:30:19 +1100 (EST) |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Flush and invalidate dirty pages at the start of a direct read also, else we can hit a delalloc-extents-via-direct-io BUG. Date: Fri Mar 17 16:29:59 AEDT 2006 Workarea: chook.melbourne.sgi.com:/build/nathans/xfs-linux Inspected by: tes The following file(s) were checked into: longdrop.melbourne.sgi.com:/isms/xfs-kern/xfs-linux-melb Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:25483a linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c - 1.237 - changed http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.237&r2=text&tr2=1.236&f=h |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 950784 - fix an ENOSPC vn_count issue, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.6.16-rc6: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE 950784 - fix an ENOSPC vn_count issue, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |