| To: | Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Mar 2006 14:34:44 +1100 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Suzuki <suzuki@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "linux-aio kvack.org" <linux-aio@xxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, suparna <suparna@xxxxxxxxxx>, akpm@xxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060317172210.GP3914@stusta.de>; from bunk@stusta.de on Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 06:22:10PM +0100 |
| References: | <440FDF3E.8060400@in.ibm.com> <20060309120306.GA26682@infradead.org> <20060309223042.GC1135@frodo> <20060309224219.GA6709@infradead.org> <20060309231422.GD1135@frodo> <20060310005020.GF1135@frodo> <20060317172210.GP3914@stusta.de> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 06:22:10PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:50:20AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Something like this (works OK for me)... > > Is this 2.6.16 material? Its been merged already. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Adrian Bunk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Adrian Bunk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Adrian Bunk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |