xfs (date)

xfs (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

March 31, 2006

Re: patch for building/installing xfs-cmds on 64 bit platforms, Timothy Shimmin, 22:06

March 30, 2006

Re: Metadata on separate volume, Nathan Scott, 22:07
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Nathan Scott, 21:40
Re: Metadata on separate volume, Mike McElroy, 18:41
Re: exclusion of trees with xfsdump, Bill Kendall, 07:23
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 04:00
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Justin Piszcz, 03:59
Re: Badness in mutex_destroy at kernel/mutex-debug.c:458, Nicolas KOWALSKI, 00:11

March 29, 2006

Re: xfs_growfs tutorial?, Eric Sandeen, 17:30
xfs_growfs tutorial?, Artur Makówka, 16:56
Re: Metadata on separate volume, Nathan Scott, 16:49
Metadata on separate volume, Mike McElroy, 16:18
Re: kernel BUG at fs/direct-io.c:916!, Badari Pulavarty, 16:14
Re: Badness in mutex_destroy at kernel/mutex-debug.c:458, Nathan Scott, 16:13
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Justin Piszcz, 16:04
Badness in mutex_destroy at kernel/mutex-debug.c:458, Nicolas KOWALSKI, 16:01
Re: kernel BUG at fs/direct-io.c:916!, Badari Pulavarty, 16:00
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 15:44
Re: kernel BUG at fs/direct-io.c:916!, Ralf Hildebrandt, 15:44
Re: kernel BUG at fs/direct-io.c:916!, Ralf Hildebrandt, 15:44
Re: exclusion of trees with xfsdump, Rumi Szabolcs, 15:32
TAKE 951415 - Remove obsolete xfs_bmap_do_search_extents(), Mandy Miklos, 14:55
patch for building xfs-cmds/attr on 64 bit platforms, Timothy Shimmin, 14:52
TAKE 951415 - Remove obsolete xfs_bmap_do_search_extents(), Mandy Miklos, 14:51
Is this thing on?, Eric Sandeen, 14:46

March 27, 2006

Re: fchown permission check bug, Steve Lord, 09:00
Re: fchown permission check bug, Steve Lord, 09:00
exclusion of trees with xfsdump, Rumi Szabolcs, 08:35
Re: fchown permission check bug, Jakob Østergaard, 08:06
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Eric Sandeen, 06:47
[no subject], Guk-Bong Kwon, 04:04
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Bogdan Costescu, 03:51
fchown permission check bug, Jakob Østergaard, 03:32

March 26, 2006

Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Nathan Scott, 21:31
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Federico Sevilla III, 17:11
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Chris Wedgwood, 16:57
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 14:57
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Nathan Scott, 14:54
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 14:50
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Justin Piszcz, 14:31
Re: kernel BUG at fs/direct-io.c:916!, Nathan Scott, 14:07
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Nathan Scott, 13:57
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 07:50
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Andreas Schwab, 06:22
Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Justin Piszcz, 06:19
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Justin Piszcz, 06:17
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, KELEMEN Peter, 04:44
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 01:26

March 25, 2006

Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Federico Sevilla III, 21:38
How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Justin Piszcz, 16:50
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Andreas Schwab, 15:52
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Andreas Schwab, 15:44
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 15:26
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 15:23
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 13:34

March 23, 2006

Re: TAKE 951193 - XFS rewrite clustering clusters clean pages, David Chinner, 18:21
Journal recovery problem with 2.6.16, temp02, 15:27
Journal recovery problem with 2.6.16?, Andrew Hall, 15:00
Re: TAKE 951193 - XFS rewrite clustering clusters clean pages, Christian Guggenberger, 03:11

March 22, 2006

TAKE 904196 - fix typos, Nathan Scott, 16:47
Why xfs_change_file_space is synchronous, Shailendra Tripathi, 06:01

March 21, 2006

TAKE 904196 - build fix, Nathan Scott, 20:55
TAKE 951200 - noikeep, Nathan Scott, 17:01
TAKE 951193 - XFS rewrite clustering clusters clean pages, David Chinner, 15:18
Re: status of CXFS on Linux etc?, Eric Sandeen, 07:10
status of CXFS on Linux etc?, Patton, Matthew F, CTR, OSD-PA&E, 06:02

March 20, 2006

TAKE 948300 - idbg build fixup, Nathan Scott, 22:01
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Nathan Scott, 13:45
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 13:39
TAKE 947420 - Fixing the conflict between DIO write and truncate, Yingping Lu, 13:32
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Nathan Scott, 13:23
Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 13:08
TAKE 948300 - Fixing KDB's xrwtrc command, Yingping Lu, 11:23
TAKE 948300 - Fixing KDB's xrwtrc command, Yingping Lu, 09:15

March 19, 2006

TAKE 904196 - Merge up to 2.6.16., Nathan Scott, 22:58
Re: pdflush not flushing all dirty_expire_centisecs, David Chinner, 16:24
Re: 2.6.16-rc6: known regressions (v2), Nathan Scott, 14:49

March 18, 2006

Re: 2.6.16-rc6: known regressions (v2), Claudio Martins, 13:56

March 17, 2006

Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Adrian Bunk, 21:02
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Nathan Scott, 19:34
Re: TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Nathan Scott, 19:26
Re: TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Christoph Hellwig, 11:04
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Adrian Bunk, 09:21
pdflush not flushing all dirty_expire_centisecs, Alexander Bergolth, 09:06
2.6.16-rc6: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, 06:37

March 16, 2006

TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Nathan Scott, 21:29
TAKE 950784 - fix an ENOSPC vn_count issue, Nathan Scott, 21:28
TAKE 951054 - bulkstat fix, Nathan Scott, 20:54
TAKE 947038 - use more consistent names, Nathan Scott, 20:45

March 15, 2006

File System Recovery, Clint Ricker, 15:53

March 14, 2006

Re: How to make the xfs utilities build look in a different directory?, Nathan Scott, 15:59
How to make the xfs utilities build look in a different directory?, Richard Troxell, 15:46
TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Mandy Miklos, 13:50
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Suparna Bhattacharya, 00:00

March 13, 2006

Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Re: 2.6.16-rc6: known regressions, Nathan Laredo, 15:59
TAKE 904196 - Merge up to 2.6.16-rc6., Nathan Scott, 14:53
2.6.16-rc6: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, 12:06

March 12, 2006

Re: logging of metadata ops, David Chinner, 13:25

March 10, 2006

Re: logging of metadata ops, Ming Zhang, 10:04
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Christoph Hellwig, 08:51
logging of metadata ops, Stewart Smith, 07:43
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Suzuki, 01:03

March 09, 2006

PARTIAL TAKE 947312 - stack, Nathan Scott, 21:39
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Nathan Scott, 16:53
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Nathan Scott, 15:17
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Christoph Hellwig, 14:42
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Nathan Scott, 14:33
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Nathan Scott, 14:25
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Christoph Hellwig, 05:06

March 08, 2006

TAKE 950678 - XFSQA: Ass fail (ifp->if_flags & (0x02|0x08)) == 0x02, xfs_bmap.c, line: 3448, Mandy Miklos, 17:18
Re: PARTIAL TAKE 947312 - reduce stack footprint, Nathan Scott, 14:34
xfs, Victor Magalotti, 08:22
Re: PARTIAL TAKE 947312 - reduce stack footprint, Christoph Hellwig, 05:51

March 06, 2006

Re: TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Mandy Miklos, 11:16
Festival de Monitores Planos y Combos a tu Gusto, Ofertas Especiales en Monitores, 03:32

March 05, 2006

Re: XFS _apparent_ corruption: "DATA POINT" (worked around); 2.6.15.4-biglowmem, Timothy Shimmin, 23:46
XFS oops in v2.6.16-rc5, Avuton Olrich, 23:13
TAKE 950556 - remove (some) linvfs names, Nathan Scott, 21:19
PARTIAL TAKE 947312 - reduce stack footprint, Nathan Scott, 16:03
XFS _apparent_ corruption: "DATA POINT" (worked around); 2.6.15.4-biglowmem, Linda Walsh, 14:40
XFS Error Possibly Related To Quota?, andy liebman, 11:40

March 04, 2006

Re: TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Stewart Smith, 19:19

March 03, 2006

TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Amanda Kirkconnell, 07:14

March 02, 2006

TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Amanda Kirkconnell, 16:42
TAKE 950491 - extra SB validation, Nathan Scott, 16:24
TAKE 950489 - xfsprogs, Nathan Scott, 15:57
PARTIAL TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Amanda Kirkconnell, 15:14
TAKE 950264 - xfs_copy, Nathan Scott, 14:25
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 13:23
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 12:43
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 12:32
RE: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Luck, Tony, 11:32
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Andi Kleen, 10:14
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Linus Torvalds, 10:06
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Linus Torvalds, 09:52
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Andi Kleen, 09:52
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Andi Kleen, 04:07

March 01, 2006

Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 22:57
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Andi Kleen, 20:55
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 19:06
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Andi Kleen, 13:35
TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 04:52