xfs (date)

xfs (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

April 01, 2006

Re: patch for building/installing xfs-cmds on 64 bit platforms, Timothy Shimmin, 00:06

March 31, 2006

Re: Metadata on separate volume, Nathan Scott, 00:07

March 30, 2006

Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Nathan Scott, 23:40
Re: Metadata on separate volume, Mike McElroy, 20:41
Re: exclusion of trees with xfsdump, Bill Kendall, 09:23
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 06:00
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Justin Piszcz, 05:59
Re: Badness in mutex_destroy at kernel/mutex-debug.c:458, Nicolas KOWALSKI, 02:11

March 29, 2006

Re: xfs_growfs tutorial?, Eric Sandeen, 19:30
xfs_growfs tutorial?, Artur Makówka, 18:56
Re: Metadata on separate volume, Nathan Scott, 18:49
Metadata on separate volume, Mike McElroy, 18:18
Re: kernel BUG at fs/direct-io.c:916!, Badari Pulavarty, 18:14
Re: Badness in mutex_destroy at kernel/mutex-debug.c:458, Nathan Scott, 18:13
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Justin Piszcz, 18:04
Badness in mutex_destroy at kernel/mutex-debug.c:458, Nicolas KOWALSKI, 18:01
Re: kernel BUG at fs/direct-io.c:916!, Badari Pulavarty, 18:00
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 17:44
Re: kernel BUG at fs/direct-io.c:916!, Ralf Hildebrandt, 17:44
Re: kernel BUG at fs/direct-io.c:916!, Ralf Hildebrandt, 17:44
Re: exclusion of trees with xfsdump, Rumi Szabolcs, 17:32
TAKE 951415 - Remove obsolete xfs_bmap_do_search_extents(), Mandy Miklos, 16:55
patch for building xfs-cmds/attr on 64 bit platforms, Timothy Shimmin, 16:52
TAKE 951415 - Remove obsolete xfs_bmap_do_search_extents(), Mandy Miklos, 16:51
Is this thing on?, Eric Sandeen, 16:46

March 27, 2006

Re: fchown permission check bug, Steve Lord, 11:00
Re: fchown permission check bug, Steve Lord, 11:00
exclusion of trees with xfsdump, Rumi Szabolcs, 10:35
Re: fchown permission check bug, Jakob Østergaard, 10:06
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Eric Sandeen, 08:47
[no subject], Guk-Bong Kwon, 06:04
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Bogdan Costescu, 05:51
fchown permission check bug, Jakob Østergaard, 05:32

March 26, 2006

Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Nathan Scott, 23:31
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Federico Sevilla III, 19:11
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Chris Wedgwood, 18:57
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 16:57
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Nathan Scott, 16:54
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 16:50
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Justin Piszcz, 16:31
Re: kernel BUG at fs/direct-io.c:916!, Nathan Scott, 16:07
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Nathan Scott, 15:57
Re: Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 09:50
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Andreas Schwab, 08:22
Could not allocate buf during xfs_fsr?, Justin Piszcz, 08:19
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Justin Piszcz, 08:17
Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, KELEMEN Peter, 06:44
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 03:26

March 25, 2006

Re: How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Federico Sevilla III, 23:38
How many people regularly defrag their XFS filesystems?, Justin Piszcz, 18:50
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Andreas Schwab, 17:52
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Andreas Schwab, 17:44
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 17:26
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 17:23
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 15:34

March 23, 2006

Re: TAKE 951193 - XFS rewrite clustering clusters clean pages, David Chinner, 20:21
Journal recovery problem with 2.6.16, temp02, 17:27
Journal recovery problem with 2.6.16?, Andrew Hall, 17:00
Re: TAKE 951193 - XFS rewrite clustering clusters clean pages, Christian Guggenberger, 05:11

March 22, 2006

TAKE 904196 - fix typos, Nathan Scott, 18:47
Why xfs_change_file_space is synchronous, Shailendra Tripathi, 08:01

March 21, 2006

TAKE 904196 - build fix, Nathan Scott, 22:55
TAKE 951200 - noikeep, Nathan Scott, 19:01
TAKE 951193 - XFS rewrite clustering clusters clean pages, David Chinner, 17:18
Re: status of CXFS on Linux etc?, Eric Sandeen, 09:10
status of CXFS on Linux etc?, Patton, Matthew F, CTR, OSD-PA&E, 08:02
TAKE 948300 - idbg build fixup, Nathan Scott, 00:01

March 20, 2006

Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Nathan Scott, 15:45
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 15:39
TAKE 947420 - Fixing the conflict between DIO write and truncate, Yingping Lu, 15:32
Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs, Nathan Scott, 15:23
Parenthesize macros in xfs, Jan Engelhardt, 15:08
TAKE 948300 - Fixing KDB's xrwtrc command, Yingping Lu, 13:23
TAKE 948300 - Fixing KDB's xrwtrc command, Yingping Lu, 11:15
TAKE 904196 - Merge up to 2.6.16., Nathan Scott, 00:58

March 19, 2006

Re: pdflush not flushing all dirty_expire_centisecs, David Chinner, 18:24
Re: 2.6.16-rc6: known regressions (v2), Nathan Scott, 16:49

March 18, 2006

Re: 2.6.16-rc6: known regressions (v2), Claudio Martins, 15:56

March 17, 2006

Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Adrian Bunk, 23:02
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Nathan Scott, 21:34
Re: TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Nathan Scott, 21:26
Re: TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Christoph Hellwig, 13:04
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Adrian Bunk, 11:21
pdflush not flushing all dirty_expire_centisecs, Alexander Bergolth, 11:06
2.6.16-rc6: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, 08:37

March 16, 2006

TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Nathan Scott, 23:29
TAKE 950784 - fix an ENOSPC vn_count issue, Nathan Scott, 23:28
TAKE 951054 - bulkstat fix, Nathan Scott, 22:54
TAKE 947038 - use more consistent names, Nathan Scott, 22:45

March 15, 2006

File System Recovery, Clint Ricker, 17:53

March 14, 2006

Re: How to make the xfs utilities build look in a different directory?, Nathan Scott, 17:59
How to make the xfs utilities build look in a different directory?, Richard Troxell, 17:46
TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Mandy Miklos, 15:50
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Suparna Bhattacharya, 02:00

March 13, 2006

Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Re: 2.6.16-rc6: known regressions, Nathan Laredo, 17:59
TAKE 904196 - Merge up to 2.6.16-rc6., Nathan Scott, 16:53
2.6.16-rc6: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, 14:06

March 12, 2006

Re: logging of metadata ops, David Chinner, 15:25

March 10, 2006

Re: logging of metadata ops, Ming Zhang, 12:04
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Christoph Hellwig, 10:51
logging of metadata ops, Stewart Smith, 09:43
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Suzuki, 03:03

March 09, 2006

PARTIAL TAKE 947312 - stack, Nathan Scott, 23:39
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Nathan Scott, 18:53
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Nathan Scott, 17:17
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Christoph Hellwig, 16:42
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Nathan Scott, 16:33
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Nathan Scott, 16:25
Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Christoph Hellwig, 07:06

March 08, 2006

TAKE 950678 - XFSQA: Ass fail (ifp->if_flags & (0x02|0x08)) == 0x02, xfs_bmap.c, line: 3448, Mandy Miklos, 19:18
Re: PARTIAL TAKE 947312 - reduce stack footprint, Nathan Scott, 16:34
xfs, Victor Magalotti, 10:22
Re: PARTIAL TAKE 947312 - reduce stack footprint, Christoph Hellwig, 07:51

March 06, 2006

Re: TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Mandy Miklos, 13:16
Festival de Monitores Planos y Combos a tu Gusto, Ofertas Especiales en Monitores, 05:32
Re: XFS _apparent_ corruption: "DATA POINT" (worked around); 2.6.15.4-biglowmem, Timothy Shimmin, 01:46
XFS oops in v2.6.16-rc5, Avuton Olrich, 01:13

March 05, 2006

TAKE 950556 - remove (some) linvfs names, Nathan Scott, 23:19
PARTIAL TAKE 947312 - reduce stack footprint, Nathan Scott, 18:03
XFS _apparent_ corruption: "DATA POINT" (worked around); 2.6.15.4-biglowmem, Linda Walsh, 16:40
XFS Error Possibly Related To Quota?, andy liebman, 13:40

March 04, 2006

Re: TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Stewart Smith, 21:19

March 03, 2006

TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Amanda Kirkconnell, 09:14

March 02, 2006

TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Amanda Kirkconnell, 18:42
TAKE 950491 - extra SB validation, Nathan Scott, 18:24
TAKE 950489 - xfsprogs, Nathan Scott, 17:57
PARTIAL TAKE 928864 - [SUSE#76685] Inode extent management causes high order page allocations, Amanda Kirkconnell, 17:14
TAKE 950264 - xfs_copy, Nathan Scott, 16:25
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 15:23
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 14:43
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 14:32
RE: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Luck, Tony, 13:32
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Andi Kleen, 12:14
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Linus Torvalds, 12:06
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Linus Torvalds, 11:52
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Andi Kleen, 11:52
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Andi Kleen, 06:07
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 00:57

March 01, 2006

Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Andi Kleen, 22:55
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 21:06
Re: TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, Andi Kleen, 15:35
TAKE 950027 - xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters fails with CONFIG_PREEMPT and >=256p, David Chinner, 06:52