xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: xfs

from [Stewart Smith] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: anonimo ominona <lost29@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs
From: Stewart Smith <stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:05:04 +1100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BAY113-F1313C8E816D16CC59EC864C0FA0@xxxxxxx>
References: <BAY113-F1313C8E816D16CC59EC864C0FA0@xxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 03:04 +0000, anonimo ominona wrote:
> Hello
>  
> Does XFS work on 32 bit PC's (32 bit processors)?

yes, extremely well too.

-- 
Stewart Smith (stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
http://www.flamingspork.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • xfs, anonimo ominona
    • Re: xfs, Stewart Smith <=
Previous by Date:  Re: xfsdump failure - failed to get bulkstat information for root node, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:  TAKE 949726 - Add hotplug cpu support to per-cpu superblock counters, David Chinner
Previous by Thread:  xfs, anonimo ominona
Next by Thread:  xfsdump failure - failed to get bulkstat information for root node, Lars Soltau
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]