| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: No local regular files |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:34:18 +1100 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Shailendra Tripathi <stripathi@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060129221048.GA17971@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601231054140.11064@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43D645CD.3030102@xxxxxxxxx> <20060124170154.GA11338@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43D6BE03.1020901@xxxxxxxxx> <20060129220627.GO43335175@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060129221048.GA17971@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 02:10:48PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:06:27AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > I can think of several tricky problems that need to be solved before > > this could work. > > I'm not aware of any practical benchmark where there is a performance > gain by doing this (fir reiser3 anyhow) and since disks are insanely > large and cheap I just don't see the point given the added complexity. Agreed. I'm just pointing out that it's not something trivial.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner R&D Software Enginner SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: No local regular files, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Allocations for zero length files, Shailendra Tripathi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: No local regular files, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problems With 2.4 XFS-NFS CVS Tree/Linux 2.6.15.1 Client, Jon Lewis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |