| To: | Shailendra Tripathi <stripathi@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: No local regular files |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:39:10 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <43D645CD.3030102@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601231054140.11064@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43D645CD.3030102@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) |
Shailendra Tripathi wrote: Am wondering what might be the reason for non-inclusion and whether it was ever implemented in XFS ? If implemented on IRIX XFS, what is potential reason for not being available on Linux ? Or, it is just that it does not give any benefit. I believe that there are significant number of such small files I don't think this behavior is any different from Irix: xfs3 1# cd /tmp xfs3 2# touch foo xfs3 3# xfs_bmap -v foo foo: no extents xfs3 4# echo a > foo xfs3 5# xfs_bmap -v foo foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE AG AG-OFFSET TOTAL FLG 0: [0..7]: 11168..11175 0 11168..11175 8 xfs3 6# du foo 8 foo xfs3 7# uname -a IRIX64 cxfs3 6.5 07010238 IP27 -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | No local regular files, Shailendra Tripathi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: No local regular files, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | No local regular files, Shailendra Tripathi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: No local regular files, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |