| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs: Makefile-linux-2.6 => Makefile? |
| From: | Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:18:11 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20060109210540.GA9972@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20060109164214.GA10367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060109164611.GA1382@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060109210105.GA13853@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060109210540.GA9972@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:05:40PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +#
> > +# The xfs people like to share Makefile with 2.6 and 2.4.
> > +# Utilise file named Kbuild file which has precedence over Makefile.
> > +#
> > +
> > +include $(srctree)/$(obj)/Makefile-linux-2.6
>
> What about just putting the content of the current Makefile-linux-2.6
> into the Kbuild file directly?
People do not expect this - since the Kbuild filename is not used expect in
the top-level directory.
So as a principle of minimum suprise I left the old Makefile as-is,
and introduced the new Kbuild file.
If xfs people likes it different then they can change it anytime.
If I one day start my little "kbuild file parser to a single makefile" project
it may be the day where we do the transition.
Sam
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs: Makefile-linux-2.6 => Makefile?, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs: Makefile-linux-2.6 => Makefile?, Sam Ravnborg |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs: Makefile-linux-2.6 => Makefile?, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs: Makefile-linux-2.6 => Makefile?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |