xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs: Makefile-linux-2.6 => Makefile?

To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs: Makefile-linux-2.6 => Makefile?
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:46:11 +0000
Cc: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060109164214.GA10367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20060109164214.GA10367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:42:14PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi hch.
> 
> Any specific reason why xfs uses a indirection for the Makefile?
> It is planned to drop export of VERSION, PATCHLEVEL etc. from
> main makefile and it is OK except for xfs due to the funny
> Makefile indirection.
> 
> I suggest:
> git mv fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 fs/xfs/Makefile

I'd be all for it, but the SGI people like this layout to keep a common
fs/xfs for both 2.4 and 2.6 (with linux-2.4 and linux-2.6 subdirs respectively)

p.s. and no, I'm not official xfs maintainer and never have been, so cc set
to linux-xfs were all interested parties hang around.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>