| To: | Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs: Makefile-linux-2.6 => Makefile? |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:46:11 +0000 |
| Cc: | hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060109164214.GA10367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20060109164214.GA10367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:42:14PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi hch. > > Any specific reason why xfs uses a indirection for the Makefile? > It is planned to drop export of VERSION, PATCHLEVEL etc. from > main makefile and it is OK except for xfs due to the funny > Makefile indirection. > > I suggest: > git mv fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 fs/xfs/Makefile I'd be all for it, but the SGI people like this layout to keep a common fs/xfs for both 2.4 and 2.6 (with linux-2.4 and linux-2.6 subdirs respectively) p.s. and no, I'm not official xfs maintainer and never have been, so cc set to linux-xfs were all interested parties hang around. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Problems using xfs on RAID 5 volumes, Horchler, Joerg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs: Makefile-linux-2.6 => Makefile?, Sam Ravnborg |
| Previous by Thread: | Problems using xfs on RAID 5 volumes, Horchler, Joerg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs: Makefile-linux-2.6 => Makefile?, Sam Ravnborg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |