xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RHEL4/SL4 XFS stack problem?

To: Michael Mansour <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RHEL4/SL4 XFS stack problem?
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 22:48:24 -0600 (CST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060104014041.M15493@npgx.com.au>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Michael Mansour wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> After building a couple of clusters using xfs on the shared storage device
> (and using md and lvm on top of that), I'm getting this error now which hard
> crashes my machines:
> 
>  do_IRQ: stack overflow: 284
>   [<c01078a2>] do_IRQ+0x44/0x130 

The rest of the message would be most interesting, to see what your stack 
actually looks like.

Recent xfs is reasonable on 4k stacks and there are a few things in the works
to make it better.  But depending on what you stack up in your IO path
you could probably still blow it.

-Eric

> I'm using Scientific Linux 4.2 (RHEL4 Update 2) with a SL Contrib kernel of:
> 
> kernel-smp-2.6.9-11.EL.XFS
> 
> which has xfs support. I also use the xfsprogs rpm supplied by Dag Wieers. I
> run on an x86 platform.
> 
> After googling quite a bit, it seems that RH have caused an issue with their
> RHEL4 release by only enabling a 4k stack, where it seems that XFS requires an
> 8k stack?
> 
> I'd really like to know how to fix this problem as I just finished months of
> works building a couple of SL4 clustered environments using XFS, and now with
> this problem am looking at the unpleasant alternative of getting rid of the
> XFS filesystems and changing them to ext3, which will take me approximately
> half a day of work per cluster for the added benefit of a slower filesystem.
> 
> I just visited the SGI site to see if there's any hints to fixes of this
> problem there, which is where I got this email address from.
> 
> Any help is very much appreciated.
> 
> Michael.
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>