|To:||James Pearson <james-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: RHEL4 2.6.9-22EL xfs module src.rpm for testing|
|From:||Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:26:00 -0600|
|User-agent:||Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720)|
James Pearson wrote:
Hey, let's give it a whirl. No promises, but please do let me know how it works out.XFS_VERSION_STRING in linux-2.6/xfs_version.h from the src.rpm states: "SGI-XFS CVS-2004-10-17_05:00_UTC"which doesn't seem right ... many of the other source files have "Copyright 2005" in them.How 'old' (or recent) is this code?
Don't worry too much about that timestamp. This code is actually from recent SuSE kernels, which we (er, Nathan, actually) keeps quite up to date, plus patches which get things going on RHEL4.
That timestamp was probably way back when SuSE originally pulled xfs from cvs, but they have had many updates since then.
We could tidy up the string, but it's harmless. -Eric
Thanks James Pearson
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: RHEL4 2.6.9-22EL xfs module src.rpm for testing, James Pearson|
|Next by Date:||Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2), Eric Sandeen|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: RHEL4 2.6.9-22EL xfs module src.rpm for testing, James Pearson|
|Next by Thread:||TAKE 945412 - Fixed an assertion failure in xfs_reclaim by delayed block, Yingping Lu|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|