xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs

To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:17:01 +0100
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20051130015959.GC19154461@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20051129003611.GF7209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051130015959.GC19154461@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
> You need at least 23GiB of disk space for the test to run. Given the
> filesytem i tested on was ~8.5TB, I guess I wouldn't have seen this.

Hmm, the fs was indeed smaller. That would probably explain it right.
I wouldn't have expected that it needed that much data.

> I can't test this on ext3 or reiserfs because they don't appear to support 
> sparse
> files larger than the filesytem itself.

JFS does. 

> 
> I'd try running this on a larger XFS filesystem (e.g. 30GB) and see if the
> problem goes away.

Will do later thanks.

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>