| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:38:04 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20051129032937.GZ501696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20051129003611.GF7209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051129032937.GZ501696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 02:29:37PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:36:11AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > I just found an new exciting way to break XFS. Or rather the > > version that's in 2.6.13. But might be a interesting try anyways. > > So I just ran this on a handy altix I had lying about between other > testing ;) > > It's currently not running 2.6.13, but I'm going to run this again > against 2.6.14 just to make sure it's not a regression. FYI, this test passes without problems on 2.6.14 on the same altix. Hmmm - I need to find an x86-64 box, I guess.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner R&D Software Enginner SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: unable to use dpkg 2.6.15-rc2, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs -- [OT] vmalloc 45-bit/32PiB address limit, Bryan J. Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |