| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:41:07 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20051129233804.GB19154461@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20051129003611.GF7209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051129032937.GZ501696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051129233804.GB19154461@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> FYI, this test passes without problems on 2.6.14 on the same altix. > Hmmm - I need to find an x86-64 box, I guess.... Thanks for testing. Build an altix kernel with 4k pages? I'm a bit sceptical the memory allocation theory is true though (see my other mails) Or perhaps it was an race and depends on specific timings :/ Anyways, if it cannot be reproduced it's fine for me to ignore. I just though I should report it. -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |