xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:21:48 +0100
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <438C70B3.5080709@xxxxxxx>
References: <20051129003611.GF7209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051129032937.GZ501696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051129091302.GB19515@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438C6B5D.1070604@xxxxxxx> <20051129145601.GF19515@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438C70B3.5080709@xxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Well, since it wants it as a single chunk of kernel memory..... that
> gets hard to do in linux. Actually it probably has one large chunk and
> is doing a realloc to get a larger chunk.

For that it should use vmalloc - also no problem because it is backed
in distributed order 0 4k pages. On 32bit the vmalloc space is a bit limited, 
but 8MB is still only a small part of it On x86-64 it's
VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>