| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:16:03 -0600 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20051129145601.GF19515@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20051129003611.GF7209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051129032937.GZ501696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051129091302.GB19515@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438C6B5D.1070604@xxxxxxx> <20051129145601.GF19515@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) |
Andi Kleen wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 08:53:17AM -0600, Steve Lord wrote:Andi Kleen wrote:Yep - on x86-64. But the machine had 8GB of RAM, so if even that runs out of memory something is wrong imho. How large allocations would it need? -Andi28 bytes per extent so in this case rather a lot. This could beAssuming it created 300k extents that would be only ~8MB. That should be no problem for a 8GB machine. -Andi Well, since it wants it as a single chunk of kernel memory..... that gets hard to do in linux. Actually it probably has one large chunk and is doing a realloc to get a larger chunk. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |