| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:56:01 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <438C6B5D.1070604@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20051129003611.GF7209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051129032937.GZ501696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051129091302.GB19515@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438C6B5D.1070604@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 08:53:17AM -0600, Steve Lord wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > >Yep - on x86-64. But the machine had 8GB of RAM, so if even that > >runs out of memory something is wrong imho. How large allocations > >would it need? > > > >-Andi > > > > 28 bytes per extent so in this case rather a lot. This could be Assuming it created 300k extents that would be only ~8MB. That should be no problem for a 8GB machine. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |