| To: | sandeen@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] fix deadlock on ENOSPC |
| From: | ASANO Masahiro <masano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:22:43 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <437DF8D8.9060704@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20051115.213347.607955969.masano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051118.192417.291442852.masano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <437DF8D8.9060704@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Eric, > ASANO Masahiro wrote: > >>Hi SGI guys, > >> > >>As I previously reported, XFS has a deadlock problem on a ENOSPC > >>device. > > > > > > No one comments the patch I sent 3 days ago. > > I'd like to know whether someone is looking now, or it's simply > > rejected. > > It's not been rejected, but we need to find some time to look into it. We > know > of the bug, but we need a bit of time to review your patch. We do appreciate > your efforts to resolve the problem! Thank you for your reply. We know the XFS allocation mechanism is multifunctional and extraordinary complicated. There is also a kind of balance on it. To fix allocator needs a bit of time. I'll wait. -- masano |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RHEL ES 4, Peter Grandi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 946028 - Mark some lookup tables const., Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] fix deadlock on ENOSPC, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 912426 - do barrier checks earlier, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |