xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RHEL ES 4

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RHEL ES 4
From: pg_xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:46:15 +0000
In-reply-to: <1132326431.12165.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <32927.68.52.44.223.1132279914.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <437D6935.2090905@xxxxxxx> <1132326431.12165.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:07:11 -0600, Rob Thompson
>>> <rthompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

[ ... ]

rthompson> This is in fact a 120 TB (not GB) filesystem that I
rthompson> am trying to build. What I am attempting to do is to
rthompson> take 80 1.6 TB arrays ((8 x 250 GB Raid 5 arrays) 10
rthompson> arrays from 8 seperate SAN's). Use LVM to make one
rthompson> large volume, then use xfs to format and mount this
rthompson> as a single filesystem.

It sounds easy :-), but both the idea and this configuration of
a single fs of that size as you describe above to me feel rather
extraordinarily ''optimistic'', to use a euphemism.

rthompson> Any advice - or gotcha's would be appreciated.

Again, the best advice I can think of is to hire RH or SGI
Professional Services to give you a non-public assessement of
your project, which probably will cost you only a small fraction
of the multimillion dollar budget; a mailing list is not an
appropriate place for such a discussion.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>