xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RHEL ES 4

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RHEL ES 4
From: "evilninja@xxxxxxx" <evilninja@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:45:50 +0100
In-reply-to: <437E0297.40807@xxxxxxx>
References: <32927.68.52.44.223.1132279914.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <437D6935.2090905@xxxxxxx> <1132326431.12165.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <437DFBD8.3070106@xxxxxxx> <437E0297.40807@xxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mail/News 1.6a1 (Windows/20051004)
Eric Sandeen schrieb:
Oh, repair on a 300T filesystem -wil-l be painful anywhere, I think, unfortunately.

hm, painful yes, but hopefully not impossible? otherwise if sth. goes wrong on a 300TB fs the only way to fix it would be restoring from backup, no matter how tiny the corruption might be (and xfs_repair could fix it easliy if only the volume was not so big)....

--
BOFH excuse #5:

static from plastic slide rules


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>