| To: | "evilninja@xxxxxxx" <evilninja@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RHEL ES 4 |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:34:31 -0600 |
| Cc: | rthompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <437DFBD8.3070106@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <32927.68.52.44.223.1132279914.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <437D6935.2090905@xxxxxxx> <1132326431.12165.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <437DFBD8.3070106@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) |
evilninja@xxxxxxx wrote: Rob Thompson schrieb:This is in fact a 120 TB (not GB) filesystem that I am trying to build.i recall an issue, where one was in need to xfs_check/xfs_repair a big xfs volume and did not have enough memory. with sizes like yours i'd run xfs_check & friends before going into production, just in case...but then again i don't remember the thread this issue was discussed, so it's totally bogus perhaps... Oh, repair on a 300T filesystem -wil-l be painful anywhere, I think, unfortunately. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 945412 - Fixed an assertion failure in xfs_reclaim by delayed block, Yingping Lu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RHEL ES 4, evilninja@xxxxxxx |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RHEL ES 4, evilninja@xxxxxxx |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RHEL ES 4, evilninja@xxxxxxx |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |