|To:||Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: XFS unstable with little memory; OOPS in prune_dcache()|
|From:||Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:48:38 -0600|
|References:||<200511081425.06695.philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx> <17264.52374.316530.749268@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200511081738.31746.philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720)|
Philipp Reisner wrote:
Well, yes and no. Although adding RAM solves the problem for me, andif my attitude was, I need it to work for my, forget the rest. I would not have posted this message.What I see here, that I triggered a problem that the XFS developers might not be aware of. Maybe they are happy that someone showed them an unusual corner case and can fix the issue. Maybe they will simplyignore me.
It's always good to have these datapoints & bug reports. On the other hand, nothing in the backtrace immediately suggests that this is an xfs bug...
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||backbone of a large-file streaming system, Nick I|
|Next by Date:||TAKE 907752 - add cpu_to_be* / be*_to_cpu helpers for userspace, Christoph Hellwig|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: XFS unstable with little memory; OOPS in prune_dcache(), Philipp Reisner|
|Next by Thread:||SGI linux xfs cvs, Jon Lewis|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|