| To: | Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS information leak during crash |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:11:15 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20051103000317.GE6759@xxxxxxxxxx>; from kas@xxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:03:17AM +0100 |
| References: | <20051102212722.GC6759@xxxxxxxxxx> <20051103101107.O6239737@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051102233629.GD6759@xxxxxxxxxx> <20051103104956.B6081538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051103000317.GE6759@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:03:17AM +0100, Jan Kasprzak wrote: > : it would only ever be uninitialised, previously-free space. > > Yes, but an old data from previously deleted files > (sendmail's temporary files, vim save files, etc) may contain > a sensitive information. Indeed. But this is a generic issue affecting most filesystems; its not specific to XFS as your original mail claimed. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS information leak during crash, Jan Kasprzak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS information leak during crash, Mikulas Patocka |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS information leak during crash, Jan Kasprzak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS information leak during crash, Alan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |