xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: XFS corruption on 2.4.28

from ['Ludek Finstrle'] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Renaat Dumon <renaat.dumon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS corruption on 2.4.28
From: "'Ludek Finstrle'" <luf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:14:00 +0100
Cc: "'Eric Sandeen'" <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20051101101910.488ED1774FE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20051101092045.GB26576@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051101101910.488ED1774FE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i 
> Thanks, but putting another kernel on that box might not be that easy, I get
> this box in an "appliance" form. I don't have the kernel .config etc

I'm sorry, I misunderstood word "appliance" before.
Why don't you claim it? Or why don't you consult it with your suplier
at least?

Luf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: XFS corruption on 2.4.28, Renaat Dumon
Next by Date:  Re: 2.6.13.2 amd64: XFS: xlog_recover_process_data: bad clientid, linux
Previous by Thread:  RE: XFS corruption on 2.4.28, Renaat Dumon
Next by Thread:  RE: XFS corruption on 2.4.28, Renaat Dumon
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]