| To: | rthompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RHEL ES 4 |
| From: | "evilninja@xxxxxxx" <evilninja@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:05:44 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1132326431.12165.9.camel@rwthompson.landmarkdigital.com> |
| References: | <32927.68.52.44.223.1132279914.squirrel@66.238.243.52> <437D6935.2090905@sgi.com> <1132326431.12165.9.camel@rwthompson.landmarkdigital.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mail/News 1.6a1 (Windows/20051004) |
Rob Thompson schrieb:
This is in fact a 120 TB (not GB) filesystem that I am trying to build. i recall an issue, where one was in need to xfs_check/xfs_repair a big xfs volume and did not have enough memory. with sizes like yours i'd run xfs_check & friends before going into production, just in case... but then again i don't remember the thread this issue was discussed, so it's totally bogus perhaps... -- BOFH excuse #266: All of the packets are empty. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fix deadlock on ENOSPC, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 945412 - Fixed an assertion failure in xfs_reclaim by delayed block, Yingping Lu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RHEL ES 4, Rob Thompson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RHEL ES 4, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |