| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr |
| From: | Ludek Finstrle <ludek.finstrle@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:11:53 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <434A76BB.8080400@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <433976C5.1000104@xxxxxxx> <20050929054410.GA30789@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051001091130.GA15808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <434174A7.6010904@xxxxxxx> <26743c10510031244x726ff508m89ecd0398417e521@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4341E780.70803@xxxxxxx> <20051004190338.GA15263@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4342D9F6.8090605@xxxxxxx> <20051010065023.GA30979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <434A76BB.8080400@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
> >>Thanks, I appreciate it... we're trying to reproduce it here. > > We've been able to exactly reproduce this in-house now. Thanks for your > help! It's nice to hear this. May I try something here or it's useless? I find the way to play with it in work time ... So I can react more quickly. My wife is ok but fourteen days before launch space shuttle (baby born date) ... Thanks Luf P.S. If I can help (e.g. test, debug output, ...) just drop me a note. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 907752 - French attr translation, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |