| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: The XFS real-time subvolume in Linux |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:41:31 -0500 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, dmarkic@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <p73u0fxz4xa.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <BAY110-F272BEC2E5C429160FB4068B4830@xxxxxxx> <434298D3.4060501@xxxxxxx> <p73u0fxz4xa.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) |
Andi Kleen wrote: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> writes:That is basically true, yes. There is a non-free GRIOV2 product in use with CXFS, but for your purposes, I think it is safe to say that there is no standalone GRIO equivalent on Linux.It's not. In fact it's a standard feature now. The CFQ2 IO scheduler has IO priorities settable with ionice, including a RT class with 8 priorities. It's not available in SLES9 though, only in newer kernels (2.6.13+)and SUSE releases (like SL10.0)-Andi Ah, but is there a bandwidth reservation system to go with it? That is the missing link here, being able to say 'I need 10 Mbytes/sec until further notice'. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: The XFS real-time subvolume in Linux, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: The XFS real-time subvolume in Linux, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: The XFS real-time subvolume in Linux, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: The XFS real-time subvolume in Linux, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |