| To: | yogesh@xxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs problem |
| From: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:36:52 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4358D4D9.2020905@gsf.de> |
| References: | <8306780C060A7D4790F8BA02CBA1B6910A94BE@sw-rz010.gsf.de> <1128677803.26500.19.camel@boing.melbourne.sgi.com> <4358D4D9.2020905@gsf.de> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.4.1 (X11/20051006) |
Hi Yogesh, I'm sorry for your 2nd crash :( It's not so simple to "up the reservation" because we really need to know why this was a problem and we don't have a sense of by how much it needs to be increased. Can you build a kernel with XFS_LOG_RES_DEBUG defined? If this is defined then a lot more information will be printed out on the next such error: e.g. the transaction type, reservation size and the component regions and their sizes which make up the transaction etc. --Tim Yogesh Bhanu wrote: Hi , |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/hda1 - Segmentation fault, Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs and lvm snapshots, tim shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs problem, Yogesh Bhanu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: GRIO, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |