xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr

To: Ludek Finstrle <ludek.finstrle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:12:11 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20051010065023.GA30979@soptik.pzkagis.cz>
References: <4338128F.8000707@sgi.com> <20050927163531.GA19652@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <433976C5.1000104@sgi.com> <20050929054410.GA30789@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <20051001091130.GA15808@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <434174A7.6010904@sgi.com> <26743c10510031244x726ff508m89ecd0398417e521@mail.gmail.com> <4341E780.70803@sgi.com> <20051004190338.GA15263@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <4342D9F6.8090605@sgi.com> <20051010065023.GA30979@soptik.pzkagis.cz>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716)
Ludek Finstrle wrote:
I'm sorry, I don't have enough time till Friday. Then I'll try to play
with the problem.

Thanks, I appreciate it... we're trying to reproduce it here.


I'm sorry my wife is pregnant and had some problems during weekend.
So I didn't try anything. I play with the problem as soon as possible
but I don't know time right now.

Luf

We've been able to exactly reproduce this in-house now. Thanks for your help!


-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>